A small percentage of grant funding can solve the research software sustainability crisis.

How It Works

1

Collect

~0.1% from research grants

2

Track

Measure software usage and impact

3

Fund

Direct resources to maintenance

The Math

  • Typical grant: $500,000
  • Our contribution: $500 (0.1%)
  • Impact: Sustainable funding for critical research tools

The U.S. research budget is approximately $180B. Appropriating 0.1% ($180M) would fund maintenance of software researchers use across all disciplines. Even considering only non-defense research (~$100B), this would fund most open-science tools, equivalent to hiring ~400 full-time software engineers.

With other countries joining the effort, we can build a sustainable global funding model for open-science maintenance.

Four Key Principles

Maintenance First

Fund the essential work of keeping software running, secure, and compatible.

Usage-Based

Resources go to tools researchers actually use, measured through downloads, citations, and grant mentions.

Shared Services

Pool resources for documentation, security, testing, and community management.

Innovation Support

Competitive grants drive new tool development while maintenance gets guaranteed funding.

Organizational Structure

The OSC operates as an independent, non-governmental organization modeled after established international bodies like ISO or IEC, but specifically designed for research software sustainability.

Membership-Based Governance

Institutional Members

Universities and research institutions with OSPOs become voting members, contributing funding and participating in strategic decisions.

Technical Committees

Domain experts from member institutions form committees to evaluate projects, set standards, and ensure quality across disciplines.

Auditing Bodies

Independent oversight committees provide transparency and accountability through regular audits and performance reviews.

Rapid Response

Streamlined processes enable quick funding decisions and support delivery without bureaucratic delays.

Beyond Standards Organizations

While inspired by standards bodies, the OSC serves a unique mission combining:

  • Fund Collection & Distribution: Systematic gathering and allocation of sustainability funding
  • Standards Development: Quality standards for research software and documentation
  • Technical Oversight: Expert evaluation and continuous improvement processes
  • Shared Services: Economy-of-scale benefits for security, testing, and community management

This structure ensures transparent operations, collegial decision-making, and rapid turnaround while maintaining the oversight and accountability that research communities require.

Implementation Plan

Phase 1: Pilot Programs

  • Partner with 3-5 universities with established OSPOs
  • Test with ~50 research grants
  • Refine metrics and processes

Phase 2: Expansion

  • Expand to 20+ institutions
  • Integrate with major funding agencies
  • Develop international partnerships

Phase 3: Scale

  • National and international adoption
  • Self-sustaining ecosystem
  • Standard practice for research grants

Benefits for Everyone

Researchers

  • More reliable, better-documented tools
  • Less time troubleshooting, more time on science
  • Reproducible research with stable software

Universities

  • Competitive advantage with better infrastructure
  • Recognition for software contributions
  • Reduced risk of research disruption

Funding Agencies

  • Greater return on investment
  • Reduced duplication across grants
  • Measurable software impact

Software Maintainers

  • Stable careers with predictable funding
  • Professional recognition for maintenance
  • Shared resources and community

Ready to Transform Research Software?

0.1% of grant funding = sustainable research infrastructure